Sunday, November 21, 2010

Hunting Season in Drilling Territory

from Allegheny Defense Project
Hunters living next to the Millennium pipeline aren’t too worried about the right-of-way that cuts through the Southern Tier of New York. After all, the nearly 100-foot wide corridor cutting through the woods creates habitat that attracts deer and turkey.

Hunting is big business in NY, bringing in more than $890 million in retail sales each year, says one study. Add lodging, gasoline purchases, restaurant meals and permits and you’re looking at a $1.5 billion contribution to the state’s economy.

How will intensive industrial shale drilling impact NY hunting? For an answer, let’s look south of the border, to Pennsylvania. Already some PA hunters have complained that their favorite spots have been cleared for drilling pads. 

On Nov. 7, Penn State advised sportsmen to be alert for Marcellus activity on public land. Drilling on PA state land increased from 1970 active permits in October 2009 to more than 4500 active this October. That’s more than double.

One problem facing hunters: increased traffic in the forests. There could be new roads and heavy truck traffic near active drill sites. The PA Dept. of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) promised to limit heavy truck traffic this weekend for bear season. Meanwhile, they urge hunters to take precautions when shooting around well sites.

How will hunters know there’s drilling in the area? DCNR says they’ll post active well pads with signs 150 yards from the edge of the pad – that’s three times the setback distance from streams, if you’re keeping score.

While there’s no obvious impact on white tail, some hunters wonder whether intensive drilling might cause declines in deer and game bird populations. Biologists in western states have observed population declines in deer, elk, grouse and Pronghorn.

The biggest factor is the impact of roads. Deer and elk depend on large unbroken stands of spruce and fir to provide shelter from wind and cold as well as cover from predators. Roads slice forests into increasingly smaller fragments, and smaller forests means smaller populations.

Well density is important: while one gas well per square mile had minimal effects on Wyoming’s mule deer populations, sixteen wells per square mile showed a significant effect.

Then there’s the question of food safety. Many hunters count on their deer to stock the freezer. But how safe is venison harvested from areas where intensive industrialized drilling takes place? Some chemicals in frack fluid and drilling wastes can accumulate in tissues, but so far there has been no research on the impact of industrialized drilling on wild food.

1 comment:

  1. Interested in the effects of drilling on livestock? Here's a few interesting studies...

    --Martha



    Edwards WC. Toxicology of oil field wastes. Hazards to livestock associated with the petroleum industry. Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, Oklahoma State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Stillwater. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1989 Jul;5(2):363-74. Review.PMID: 2667711 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related citations http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2667711



    Edwards WC, Gregory DG. Livestock poisoning from oil field drilling fluids, muds and additives.

    Oklahoma Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1991 Oct;33(5):502-4. 1746149 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related citations http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1746149



    Edwards VC, Coppock RW, Zinn LL.. Vet Hum Toxicol. Toxicoses related to the petroleum industry. 1979 Oct;21(5):328-37. .PMID: 516361 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related citations http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/516361

    Edwards WC. Toxicology of oil field wastes. Hazards to livestock associated with the petroleum industry. Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, Oklahoma State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Stillwater. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1989 Jul;5(2):363-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2667711

    Coppock RW, Mostrom MS, Stair EL, Semalulu SS. Toxicopathology of oilfield poisoning in cattle: a review.

    Environmental Toxicology Research, Alberta Environmental Centre, Canada. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1996 Feb;38(1):36-42. Review.PMID: 8825749 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related citations http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8825749



    Coppock RW, Mostrom MS, Khan AA, Semalulu SS. Toxicology of oil field pollutants in cattle: a review.

    Environmental Toxicology Research, Alberta Environmental Centre, Vegreville, Canada. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1995 Dec;37(6):569-76. Review.PMID: 8588300 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related citations http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8588300

    ReplyDelete