Will Science Determine NY Drilling Policy?

When it comes to fracking, NY Governor Andrew Cuomo has repeatedly and publicly pledged to “let the science and the facts make the determination, not emotion and not politics.”

And who could be more scientific and less emotional than the US Geological Survey? Dusty Horwitt, Senior Counsel for the Environmental Working Group recently reviewed comments the USGS sent in response to the most recent revised draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement (SGEIS) for high-volume horizontal hydraulic fracturing in shales. 

The plan is flawed, say the federal scientists. And allowing drilling and fracking would endanger water supplies of rural and urban residents.

In the SGEIS the NY State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) proposes that a 500-foot buffer is sufficient to protect water sources and aquifers.

USGS disagrees. A 500-foot buffer around aquifers that supply major municipal water systems may provide only partial protection to these aquifers, they say. Likewise, a 500-foot buffer for private water wells and springs affords only limited protection and doesn’t take local geology, hydrology nor topography into account.  Water quality changes can occur at significant distance from a disturbance – especially if a domestic well is located below a well pad – and USGS suggests that in some cases state regulators need to be thinking in terms of miles, not feet.

Federal scientists also criticized the SGEIS for under-representing number and extent of natural faults in the region where shale gas drilling would occur. USGS pointed out that drilling and hydraulic fracturing directly beneath faults could potentially allow contaminant to flow upward into underground aquifers. They pointed out that there are generally far more natural faults in bedrock overlying the Marcellus Shale than other places.

   

USGS also criticized what they perceive as a lack of detailed information on underground freshwater sources. The depths of underground drinking water sources are not well documented – these must be established so that drilling companies can design casing and cementing to prevent migration of gas or saltwater into underground drinking water supplies. NY State doesn’t require drilling companies to map underground fresh water and salt water sources before they drill – and that information is critical to the design and installation of effective casing and cementing. You can read more here.

Another Judge Upholds Second Town Ban on Fracking

For the second time in a week a NY Supreme court judge has determined that a town does have the right to ban fracking using zoning and land use law. This afternoon Justice Donald F. Cerio upheld the town of Middlefield, NY (Otsego County) ban on fracking within town boundaries.The town board passed the new zoning law at the end of June, 2011.

In September, dairy farmer and town resident Jennifer Huntington initiated a lawsuit against the town claiming that the new law is illegal and infringes on her private property rights to allow gas drilling on her land.


Judge Cerio disagrees. While the state has the power to regulate how the industry operates, the town has the right to determine where that industry may - or may not - operate. You can read the judge's decision here.

Canadian Farmers Call for a Fracking Moratorium

a NY farmer preparing field for beans.

Yesterday the National Farmers Union in Canada called for a moratorium against fracking. Jan Slomp, a dairy farmer and coordinator for the NFU in Alberta says that many farmers in her area have either experienced problems with their water wells or have neighbors whose wells have been affected by drilling.

“We are in the heart of Alberta’s oil and gas country where our ability to produce good, wholesome food is at risk of being compromised by the widespread, virtually unregulated use of this dangerous process,” Slomp told the press.

Unfortunately, she said, “not many stories of contaminated water are made public because the oil and gas companies usually force farmers to sign confidentiality agreements in return for replacement of their water wells.”

Slomp also said that the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers have acknowledged that problems exist with fracking, and have released some suggestions to prevent further problems. “However, these voluntary guidelines are no substitute for strong regulations enforced by an impartial government body,” she said.

Judge says Yes, Towns Can Ban Drilling

Yesterday a New York State judge ruled that the town of Dryden (Tompkins County) can ban natural gas drilling within its boundaries. State Supreme Court Judge Phillip Rumsey found that a clause in NY state oil and gas law that gives the state power to regulate drilling does not prohibit municipalities from banning gas drilling or using zoning laws to prohibit gas drilling within the town's boundaries.


The Colorado-based company, Anschutz Exploration Corporation sued the town for amending their zoning regulations to ban drilling within the town limits. Anschutz has extensive leases in the town.

I haven't had time to read the decision yet, but you can read it here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/82343267/DrydenDecision

This is only the first step. Appeals are sure to come. 

corrected and updates 10:45 am

Montrose Council, Free Speech & Free Press

Tonight the Montrose Borough  council will meet for the third time in as many weeks. Their first meeting, on Feb. 6 came to an abrupt halt when, after being filmed for ten minutes, they decided that anyone with objections to being recorded by video camera could walk out. They walked.

Remember – that was an open meeting for conducting the public’s business.

Then last week, the council members elected to represent the people, instituted a long list of ways to restrict public speech and freedom of the press.

What will they do tonight? Go early to get a seat. Locals are hoping that plenty of camera- and recorder-laden reporters show up to document the antics of this council. And one citizen reporter is asking that “free people” stand up for their right to free speech and a free press. “Come early and bring a camera,” she advises. Bring a notebook and pencil too – because so far the council hasn't banned those. Perhaps they haven’t heard that the pen is mightier than the sword...

The council meeting begins at 7:30 pm in the Montrose Borough Building, 61 Cherry Street, Montrose PA.

Shenanigans in the Montrose Council Chambers

On Tuesday night the elected representatives of the Borough of Montrose, PA approved a laundry list of actions intended to clamp down on the public’s right to record and disseminate information about the council’s actions. The special meeting was adjourned after the council passed restrictions on how people, including journalists can engage in news-collecting by:

•    restricting public comment to borough residents and taxpayers; 
•  limiting opportunity to speak by borough residents and taxpayers to three minutes; 
• requiring video and recording devices to be located behind the last row of chairs in the meeting room; 
•  requiring video recording devices to be mounted on tripods and remain stationary and unmanned throughout the meeting; 
•  and requiring audio recording devices to also be located behind the back row and be visible.

 Press reports quote ACLU staff attorney Mary Catherine Roper as characterizing the new rules as “wacky”, saying that they go too far.

A good portion of time before the meeting even started council members tried to persuade a credentialed independent journalist to move her video camera to the back of the room. They finally ordered a policeman to take her camera – and this occurred before the new rules were voted on. Their reason: someone might trip over the tripod.

Why are the good councilors of Montrose afraid of people recording their public, open meetings? Meetings that, according to PA law anyone can attend? Meetings that, according to PA law may be recorded?

Perhaps it has to do with an agenda item listed on their February 6 meeting – an item never discussed because the meeting was brought to an abrupt halt. Item number three, listed on the agenda under “Discussion Items” was “Jessup Street, water hydrant.” Nothing dramatic about that, unless you happen to know that the Pennsylvania American Water Company placed a hydrant there, on private land, and that hydrant is being used to fill a small water truck that delivers water to Dimock residents with contaminated wells, but who aren’t receiving water deliveries from the EPA.

About one dozen people showed up that night to hear the council’s discussion regarding the hydrant. The above-mentioned indy journalist was present with her video camera. She started recording before the meeting started, without any comments from the council members. However, once the council meeting was convened, the supervisor advised that people who, for religious or other reasons didn’t want their images recorded, could leave the room. All but one council member left, abandoning the council chambers, the citizens they’ve sworn to represent, the PA state constitution and democracy. You can watch that video here.

A few days before that, journalist and film-maker Josh Fox was forcibly removed from a public hearing in the Science, Space and Technology committee in Washington DC, and arrested – an action that many Representatives decried as shameful censorship. On Feb. 15 the US Attorney dropped the case, finding it baseless and without merit. Fox said that the incident “…serves as a painful reminder that we do not have rights unless we exercise them.” You can read his entire comment here.

3355 Marcellus violations in four years

Yesterday the PennEnvironment Research and Policy Center released a new study documenting 3,355 violations by gas operators in the Marcellus over the last four years. Between 2008 and 2011 energy companies drilled a total of 4,596 new wells in Pennsylvania and, says Erika Staaf of PennEnvironment, they “are either unable or unwilling to comply with basic environmental laws.”  

The research and policy center has called on state leaders to halt additional shale gas drilling until operators can demonstrate that they can extract gas in a manner that is safe for the environment and public health – “a threshold that, to date, they have not met,” says Staaf.

As if to underscore the gravity of this situation, today the PA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) announced that the agency has fined Chesapeake Appalachia $565,000 for multiple violations:

• $215,000 for a March 2011 incident in West Branch Township, Potter County, where sediment discharged into a stream classified as high quality
• $190,000 as part of a consent order and agreement after the operator lost control of a well head during hydraulic fracturing of the Atgas 2H Well in Leroy Township, Bradford County, on April 19, 2011. Fluids from the well mixed with rainwater and entered a nearby unnamed tributary to Towanda Creek and Towanda Creek itself.
• $160,000 as part of a consent order and agreement resulting from violations in 2010 of impacting a wetland and allowing sediment to enter Sugar Creek in North Towanda Township, Bradford County.

You can download the Chesapeake consent orders here

You can read PennEnvironment’s study here