The other day a huge truck - a 37-plus-ton monster with 14 rows of wheels (8 wheels per row) - got itself stuck on Turnpike road in Brooklyn Township, Susquehanna County, PA. Seems it was on its way to the Williams Central Compressor station and couldn't make the grade. Not only did it require a bit of pushing to get it out of stuck, but it left the road a mess - a road that, according to the residents, the company just "fixed" in order to accommodate their trucks.
Frank Finan posted a video of how they finally got the monster truck moving again. This is what traffic looks like, say the locals. Plus they can hear drilling and fracking all around them, so there's never a dull - or quiet - moment.
Friday, March 22, 2013
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
3rd NY Town Wins in Court over Frack Ban
Last week acting Supreme Court justice Robert Wiggins (Livingston County, NY) ruled in favor of the Town of Avon's fracking ban. He cited Court of Appeals precedents and decisions in favor of local bans in the towns of Dryden and Middlefield. This makes the third NY town to win in a court case challenging a town's right to ban fracking.
Gas drilling company Lenape Resources sued the Town of Avon and the state Department of Environmental Conservation over the town's moratorium on drilling, saying the action threatened to put it out of business after having operated in the town for decades. Owner John Holko asked for $50 million in damages, and said he'd included DEC in the lawsuit because he felt the agency has a duty to stop towns from enacting local bans.
You can read more here.
Read the court decision at http://www.scribd.com/doc/131442865/Avon-HOME-RULE-Decision
Gas drilling company Lenape Resources sued the Town of Avon and the state Department of Environmental Conservation over the town's moratorium on drilling, saying the action threatened to put it out of business after having operated in the town for decades. Owner John Holko asked for $50 million in damages, and said he'd included DEC in the lawsuit because he felt the agency has a duty to stop towns from enacting local bans.
You can read more here.
Read the court decision at http://www.scribd.com/doc/131442865/Avon-HOME-RULE-Decision
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Protecting Drinking Water Starts with Upland Watersheds
On Wednesday, USGS released a report on the hydrogeology of the aquifer system in the Susquehanna River Valley in parts of Broome and
Chenango Counties of New York. While industry flaks spin this report as
proclaiming “lots of water for industrial use”. The USGS report actually highlights
the role of aquifer protection in the context of gas drilling impacts:
"Aquifer
protection in the study area is a topic of public concern in relation to the
potential for natural gas drilling in this part of New York. Aquifer protection
efforts likely will focus on currently used resources. Information provided in
this report may help managers prioritize protection of largely unused aquifers
whose characteristics suggest that they are capable of providing large public
or commercial water supplies." p. 17.
Rachel Treichler’s excellent analysis points out why this
study is valuable to communities in the Southern Tier. Of particular
importance, the report highlights the close connections between uplands and the
valley aquifers. If water quality in streams is compromised by activities in
the upland watershed, groundwater quality in the valleys may be compromised.
Therefore, it is not good enough to simply protect valley “wellheads” for local
water supplies. We need to protect the upland watersheds.
Deer, Drilling and other Wildlife Considerations
Page 40 in Mar 13 Mulligan Shopping Guide |
In a recent gas industry ad, hunter and sportsman Alan
Probst proclaims that natural gas drilling will benefit wildlife.
On the one hand, he’s right. The pipeline right-of-ways that
cut through forests, will need to be kept free of trees for as long as the gas
shall run. And as all deer hunters know, those right-of-ways make great habitat
for deer.
What he doesn’t say is what everyone already knows: we
already have too many deer for the hunters to keep up with, and that deer population
has tremendous and far-reaching impacts on our forests.
If you grow a garden, or walk in the woods, you already know
this. When is the last time you saw young tree seedlings in your woods?
According to Bernd Blossey, associate professor in Cornell University’s
Department of Natural Resources, it takes ten years for an oak seedling to grow
tall enough to survive deer browsing. Most don’t make it past two.
He cites a research project in the Allegheny National Forest
that demonstrated some of the impacts of deer on the landscape. Instead of
excluding deer from areas, scientists enclosed deer inside of fences. That way
they could control the population density of the herds. After tabulating tree
regeneration for a decade the researchers found a clear relationship between
deer pressure and the diversity of trees in their enclosures: a more diverse
population of tree seedlings grew where there were fewer deer; more deer led to
a less diverse forest.
Bad enough news for those depending on the back-forty
woodlot to regenerate itself in a sustainable manner for the next generation… But
the impacts go beyond timber interests. The researchers also looked at caterpillar
populations in the various enclosures. Where the deer density was low, there
was a high population of caterpillars; more deer meant fewer caterpillars. And
that has huge implications for the forest-dwelling birds that depend on
caterpillars to feed their nestlings. Some studies find an abundance of birds
in the forest canopies, but few in the mid-story and shrubs.
And aren’t birds wildlife too, Alan?
Friday, March 15, 2013
Fracking the Farm Part 4: Perception and Food Safety
What happens when gas drilling and organic agriculture
collide? This series considers some of the issues. Posts are drawn from a
3-part series originally published in New York Organic News (NOFA-NY) in 2012.
Research was supported with a grant from SEJ's Fund for Environmental Journalism.
Two years ago the Park Slope Food Co-op publicly stated that if hydro-fracking were allowed in New York, they would “research alternatives to New York State products.” The 15,800-member retail food cooperative purchases more than $1.5 million in New York State fruits and vegetables and another $1 million in poultry, beef, lamb and pork. They also purchase NY-made yogurt, cheese, eggs, cider and milk and take their responsibility to “buy local” seriously.
Two years ago the Park Slope Food Co-op publicly stated that if hydro-fracking were allowed in New York, they would “research alternatives to New York State products.” The 15,800-member retail food cooperative purchases more than $1.5 million in New York State fruits and vegetables and another $1 million in poultry, beef, lamb and pork. They also purchase NY-made yogurt, cheese, eggs, cider and milk and take their responsibility to “buy local” seriously.
Fracking – even if it weren’t on the producer’s farm – would
be a deal-breaker. One that, says NOFA-member Ken Jaffe, would have a dramatic
effect on his farm.
Jaffe raises grass fed beef on hilly pastures in the Western
Catskills. Slope Farm is situated on 100 acres in Delaware County, located near
the headwaters of the Susquehanna River and just outside the “no fracking”
buffer zone protecting the NYC watershed. He leases another 300 acres of
pastures and hayfields and contracts grazing with other farmers. Some of his
beef ends up at the Park Slope Co-op and other NYC markets, so Jaffe takes
extra care to ensure his cattle are raised well away from drilling areas. But
what happens when drilling moves into an area?
That’s not a rhetorical question for Jaffe. Just a few
months ago he began negotiating a two-year grazing contract with a Tioga County
farmer. But at the end of September, Houston-based Carrizo Oil and Gas started
drilling an exploratory Marcellus well in Owego, NY. Now Jaffe’s re-thinking
that contract, especially since Governor Andrew Cuomo has already indicated
that he’d allow horizontal hydro-fracking Tioga and four other Southern Tier
counties.
The primary concern for Jaffe’s buyers is what’s in the
meat. “No one at the regulatory level is investigating this,” he says,
disbelief in his voice. He cites the Pennsylvania case where 28 cows were
quarantined after exposure to drilling fluids. No one, to his knowledge, has
looked for any chemical residues in those animals.
The proximity of gas drilling chemicals and waste fluids to
food production raises questions about the safety of grain and vegetables as
well as the meat, eggs and dairy products. Not only is there no federal funding
for research on the impacts of chemical contamination on food, there are also
no required tests for contaminants.
Testing won’t make much difference, though, if there’s a
perception that food comes from a contaminated place, says Stefan Senders. Two
years ago he started Wide Awake Bakery in upstate NY. Production is small –
between 500 to 700 loaves a week – but the focus, Senders says, is to nurture a
local economy. One neighbor grows the organic grains, another neighbor mills
them, and Senders bakes them into wholesome loaves.
“The wheat, the flour, and the bread are wholesome,” says
Senders. “They bring our communities together, give us work, nourish us, and
make our bodies and our land healthier.” Fracking threatens that because bread
needs water, Senders explains. His rye flour requires nearly equal proportions
of water and flour, and the purity of that water is critical. “What happens if
you put your second ingredient at risk?”
Should drilling contaminate local wells, Senders could truck
in water. But no farmer can afford to truck in irrigation water, he says. And
without local grain, what’s a miller to grind? The illusion, says Senders is
that you only need to fix one thing – maybe bring in water. “But when you
frack, eventually everything fractures.”
Thursday, March 14, 2013
Another Malfunctioning Pennsylvania Well
Last night an equipment failure happened during
well-completion activities on the Yarasavage 1H northwest of Tunkhannock, PA.
The well, drilled into Marcellus shale well, is owned by Carrizo Oil & Gas.
An equipment failure led to release of completion fluids – at an initial rate
of 800 gal/minute. About 5,400 barrels were captured in tanks, and other fluid
running off the pad was captured by a catch basin set up near the road.
The waste fluid leak was only part of the problem; natural
gas also leaked from the well. So last night officials asked four families
living within 1500 feet of the well site to evacuate. Three more families voluntarily
evacuated to a local hotel.
By this afternoon well crews managed to cap the
malfunctioning well, and residents were allowed to return home. State Department
of Environmental Protection (DEP) crews told the press that they did a “sweep”
of a mile-and-a-half wide circle around the well to detect volatile organic
chemicals and/or methane in the air. They found none. They also reported that
they tested for radiation but didn’t find any.
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Fracking the Farm Part 3: Impacts on Crops
What happens when gas drilling and organic agriculture
collide? This series considers some of the issues. Posts are drawn from a
3-part series originally published in New York Organic News (NOFA-NY) in 2012.
Research was supported with a grant from SEJ's Fund for Environmental Journalism.
Bradford County, PA |
Healthy soil is vital for organic farming, but drilling and
related activities can compromise soil health. Four years ago a nursery owner
in Texas lost 500 oak seedlings when a pipeline used to transfer brine to an
underground injection well leaked. Brine is the salty well waste fluid that
flows out of shale after drilling. But there’s more than salt in brine; there’s
also benzene, heavy metals and radioactive compounds. XTO Energy, the company
responsible for the leak, ended up trucking more than 3,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil to a regulated landfill.
The shale oil rush in North Dakota has brought soil trouble
to farmers, too. Like Marcellus, the Bakken shale must be fracked to release
the hydrocarbons. Like shale gas wells, fracked oil shale wells produce briney
waste fluids that must be hauled to underground injection wells. But recent
data shows that a lot of that waste never makes it to regulated disposal sites
– it is spilled or dumped along the way. Last year there were 1,000 “accidental
releases” of waste fluids and additional unreported releases along the roads.
These spills have sterilized acres of farmland. One spill alone covered 24
acres with 2 million gallons of brine. A year after remediation efforts,
nothing grows on that land. Not even weeds.
Dimock, PA, famous for water contamination is now facing
soil contamination. According to the July 7 Pennsylvania Bulletin, Cabot Oil
and Gas will begin remediation efforts at one of their well sites. A study
found the soil to be “impacted by VOCs (volatile organic chemicals), SVOCs
(semi-volatile organic chemicals), metals, and ethylene glycol due to a release
from the reserve pit and a release from the mud shelf.”
Leaking pipelines can impact crops, too. Methane and other
hydrocarbons leaking into soil displace air, thus depleting the oxygen. That in
turn can change soil pH, and influence the microbial habitat. The result is
severe retardation of crop growth, and sometimes early senescence or death.
Air quality is becoming an issue in the gas fields. Rural
areas of Wyoming and Utah have measured ozone levels as high as 125 to 140
parts per billion (ppb) – much higher than EPA’s standard of 75 ppb and
exceeding the smog levels in Los Angeles. Down in the Texas Barnett shale ozone
levels reach 135 ppb, and in Fort Worth gas drilling produces as much
ground-level ozone as all the cars and trucks in the city.
Though we don’t have shale gas drilling, NY is not immune.
Chautauqua County, home to about 6,000 gas wells, boasts the second highest
ozone level in the state. Where is all this ozone coming from? Emissions from
drilling pads, truck traffic servicing those pads, and the compressors and
other equipment related to drilling. The Clean Air Act regulates ozone, but the
oil and gas industry enjoys exemption from those regulations.
Up in the atmosphere ozone is beneficial, protecting the
earth from harmful ultraviolet rays. But at ground level it’s a major
pollutant, causing more damage to crops than all other air pollutants combined.
Each year it’s responsible for an estimated $500 million reduction in crop
yields – and that’s just in the United States.
Ozone is created by chemical reactions between nitrogen
oxides and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the presence of sunlight. It
enters leaves through stomata during normal gas exchange, like oxygen, but is
more reactive. It can cause spotting and bleaching of leaves, affecting plant
growth, flowering, fruiting and yield. Ozone damage can make some crops
unmarketable, as in the case of spotting on spinach leaves.
Grapes are particularly sensitive to ozone, says Art Hunt,
owner of Hunt Country Vineyards on the north western shore of Keuka Lake.
Before the Clean Air Act went into effect, air pollution caused spots on his
leaves. That, in turn, affected vine growth, fruit ripening and yield. Large
scale industrialized drilling, he says, could roll back the gains made from
clean air regulations.
Ozone can also make crops more susceptible to pathogens and
pests and, in the case of clover and other crops, retard root growth. For farmers, high ozone levels may mean lower
nutritive value of their forage crops. It may alter how well herbicides work,
promote the growth of perennial weeds and create opportunities for invasive species
to move in.
Crops sensitive to ozone:
beans (string and snap),
beets
carrots
corn,
grapes (wine and juice)
peas
pinto beans
melons (cantaloupes and musk melons)
peaches
potatoes
squash
strawberries
tomatoes
turnips
watermelon
Ozone also affects grains, including wheat and rice, as well
as tobacco, soybeans, alfalfa, sorghum and cotton.
Monday, March 11, 2013
Fracking the Farm Part 2: Losing Dairy to Drilling
What happens when gas drilling and organic agriculture
collide? This series considers some of the issues. Posts are drawn from a
3-part series originally published in New York Organic News (NOFA-NY) in 2012.
Research was supported with a grant from SEJ's Fund for Environmental Journalism.
When Carol French signed a gas lease she never dreamed that
half a dozen years later she’d be warning other farmers to think twice. French,
a dairy farmer in Bradford County, Pennsylvania, lives in the midst of the
drill zone. The last time she counted, there were nine active wells located
within a mile of her farm.
photo by Frank Finan |
Carolyn Knapp, an organic dairy farmer, lives just a couple
miles away. Six years ago she was concerned that signing a lease might affect
her organic status. It didn’t. Now, with a handful of wells drilled nearby, she
worries about other ways that gas drilling and exploration could impact her
operation.
The problem: gas leases do not protect farmland. Once those
leases are signed, say Knapp and French, farmers lose control over their land.
Gas companies decide where to place access roads, well pads, pipelines and
compressors – and that can interrupt normal farming activities.
One of French’s neighbors ended up with a well pad sited
behind his barn, effectively cutting off easy access to the fields and pasture.
The farmer is earning royalties, French said – about $400/month. But he sold
his cows because the drilling operations made it too hard to keep on farming.
Knapp, who integrates intensive grazing into her dairy operation, said drillers
planned to dig a 20-acre water impoundment right in the middle of her
rotational grazing system.
Agricultural land is hit particularly hard; research shows
that in the Marcellus, farmland makes up about 62 percent of the acreage
affected by drilling. And when Penn State professor Tim Kelsey surveyed Bradford
and Tioga counties in PA, his data showed that the number of wells in an area
has an impact on farming. Areas with 150 or more gas wells lost 19 percent of
their dairy herd; areas with no wells experienced only a 1 percent loss.
He doesn’t have an exact number, but Kelsey says there is no
doubt that dairy farmers are quitting because of drilling. Even if their own
farms are not impacted, farmers face other challenges. Landowners who used to
lease fields to farmers are now renting their land for drilling-related uses
such as equipment storage and water withdrawal sites. Large impoundments take
land out of production, and crop yields are down in reclaimed pipeline
right-of-ways. Add to that the scarcity of sawdust for bedding (it’s mixed with
drill cuttings before they’re trucked to landfills) and the recent addition of
an 8-cent-per- hundredweight surcharge for hauling milk (gas companies pay higher
wages for those with CDL licenses) and it’s clear that the Marcellus boom is a
bust for some farmers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)