Can blood tests show the impacts of gas and oil drilling?
That’s a question one Colorado doctor hopes to answer. Dr. John Hughes, of
Aspen Integrative Medicine recently tested the blood of several Carbondale
residents, according to a recent article in the Aspen Daily News. He tested ten
people for a range of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including benzene,
toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene – compounds found in air samples in many
drilling areas. His preliminary results found low levels of xylene but, as
reporter Nelson Harvey puts it, “no VOC concentrations above federal health
thresholds”.
Hughes is looking at this as a baseline, as two gas
companies intend to develop 18 gas leases in the area. He’s trying to generate
some health data prior to drilling.
Hughes compared the Carbondale samples with blood samples
from ten residents in Erie, where close to 17,000 gas wells have already been
drilled. He found high levels of ethylbenzene – around 118 parts per billion
(ppb) – in the blood of nine Erie test subjects. All of those residents lived between 300 and 1,800 feet from gas
wells, and the highest levels ethylbenzene that Hughes detected was found in
people living closest to wells.
By contrast, none of the samples from Carbondale residents
showed high levels of ethylbenzene.
The Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for ethylbenzene notes
that the chemical; “may cause adverse reproductive effects and birth defects …
(and) may cause cancer…” That data is based on animal testing.
According to the Centers for Disease Control &Prevention (CDC) National Biomonitoring Program, the median ethylbenzene level
in adult’s blood was 0.060 ppb, although residents in high density urban areas may
have ethylbenzene levels twice that high. “Workers in the petroleum industry
and those with solvent exposure can have blood ethylbenzene levels that are
several hundred times higher than those in the general population,” notes the
report.
At this time, finding “measurable” levels of ethylbenzene in
the blood doesn’t automatically mean the chemical is causing adverse health
effects. That data hasn’t been gathered yet. But biomonitoring studies are important, as they
can provide health officials with
reference values when determining whether people have been exposed to higher
levels of ethylbenzene than are found in the general population.
And that is exactly what Hughes is doing: using biomonitoring
to establish a baseline for Carbondale residents and, if he can continue, study the environmental
exposures associated with drilling.
good news; need more blood baselines; we are being contaminated; doesn't take a genius to figure this one out. thanks,
ReplyDelete